Impact of animal traction power on agricultural productivity: case of lowlands of Mohale's Hoek district of Lesotho
| dc.contributor.advisor | Obi, Ajuruchukwu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Rampokanyo, Lepolesa Michael | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-28T10:30:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-28T10:30:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Most farming at subsistence level is located in rural areas where the majority of smallholder farmers have low productivity which results in high rate of food insecurity. The areas are characterised by animal traction and poor farming practises, and monoculture is mostly preferred. In light of this, this study analyzed the impact of animal power on agricultural productivity. Smallholder farmers in the lowlands of Mohale’s Hoek district of Lesotho were investigated by means of a case study methodology. The aim of the study was to inform agricultural policy about the level and key determinants of inefficiency in the smallholder farming system so as to contribute to policy designed to raise productivity of smallholder farmers. The sampling frame comprised farmers and extension workers in the lowlands of Mohale’s Hoek district. From this frame, 118 farmers and 4 extension workers were randomly selected from four villages, namely‘Mapotsane, Potsane, Tsoloane and Siloe. The four groups of farmers include; the farmers owning and using cattle for ploughing, farmers owning tractor and cattle and using them for ploughing, farmers owning tractor only and using it for ploughing, and farmers who owned neither cattle nor tractor and normally hire these when ploughing operations are to be done on the farm. The interviews of these farmers and extension workers were conducted by means of semi-structured questionnaire which consisted of both open and close ended questions. The study used the stochastic frontier production model for the production efficiencies and linear regression model for the impact of animal traction on agricultural productivity. Both procedures provided insights into the relative contributions of animal power and traditional systems to poverty alleviation and food security in the project areas. Descriptive statistics were employed for farming systems and challenges facing small scale farmers. Gross Margins analysis was conducted for the animal power and tractor power yield levels for maize crop to compare the two types of power. Some diagnostic tests to detect serial correlation and heteroskedasticity and t-tests were also performed. The significant variables include the area of sorghum ploughed, members of the household that assist with family labour, education, quantity of fertilizer applied, time taken by the farmers in farming, members who are formally employed, household size, area of land ploughed, old age, costs of tractor and animal, marital status, income, area of maize ploughed, area of sorghum ploughed, quantity of fertilizers applied, costs of seeds and fertilizers applied, maize and sorghum yield and amount sold and consumed. The study revealed that monoculture is mainly practised and many smallholder farmers used traditional technologies that fail to replace nutrients in the soil. Nonetheless family labour was not a problem. During the farming season, tractors were used as the main source of power for ploughing. Most farmers hired these for maize production as it is a staple food crop even where animal power is available. It was noted that the tractors were few and in most cases old and malfunctioning. The cost of using animals in farming obviouslyplayed a role in the production of both maize v and sorghum in the lowland areas of Mohale’s Hoek district. Smallholder farmers who owned both tractors and animals produced more but they were mainly affected by high costs of maintaining the aging tractors, generally purchased on the used-equipment market. The increased challenges resulted in lower productivity of the smallholder farmers, including: unhealthy animals, drought, marketing problems, late ploughing, poor soils, lack of extension services, low yields, low income, lack of information, lack of appropriate implements, lack of support services, nutrition inadequacy, inappropriate farming systems. The study recommended the adoption and promotion of low-cost mechanization in the lowlands of Mohale’s Hoek district so as to increase the production of the smallholder farmers. Increased productivity will in turn improve household food security. | en |
| dc.format | xviii, 199 leaves; 30 cm | en |
| dc.format | en | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Rampokanyo, Lepolesa Michael. 2012 | en |
| dc.identifier.other | vital:11178 | en |
| dc.identifier.other | http://hdl.handle.net/10353/483 | en |
| dc.identifier.other | Animal traction -- Lesotho | en |
| dc.identifier.other | Agricultural productivity -- Lesotho | en |
| dc.identifier.other | Draft animals -- Lesotho | en |
| dc.identifier.other | Food security -- Lesotho | en |
| dc.identifier.other | Farm produce -- Lesotho | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11837/4190 | |
| dc.language.iso | English | en |
| dc.publisher | University of Fort Hare | en |
| dc.publisher | Faculty of Science & Agriculture | en |
| dc.rights | University of Fort Hare | en |
| dc.subject | Animal traction -- Lesotho | en |
| dc.subject | Agricultural productivity -- Lesotho | en |
| dc.subject | Draft animals -- Lesotho | en |
| dc.subject | Food security -- Lesotho | en |
| dc.subject | Farm produce -- Lesotho | en |
| dc.title | Impact of animal traction power on agricultural productivity: case of lowlands of Mohale's Hoek district of Lesotho | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Impact of animal traction power on agricultural productivity: case of lowlands of Mohale's Hoek district of Lesotho | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | en |
| dc.type | Masters | en |
| dc.type | MSc Agric (Agricultural Economics) | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- vital_11178+SOURCEPDF+SOURCEPDF.0.pdf
- Size:
- 2.21 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format