Strategies of normative ambivalence in critical theories of recognition for the decolonised diagnosis of conflict and oppression
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024-12
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Wiley
Abstract
A context of protracted postcolonial misrecognition and social injustice brought most of the contributors to this special issue together. This context raises an acute awareness of the ideological limitations not only of the dominant normative frameworks of recognition, developed by social and political theorists such as Axel Honneth, Nancy Fraser, and Charles Taylor, but of the African philosophical conceptions of recognition represented by ubuntu. What is the ethical or normative status of the insights into social ontology that we find in theories of recognition? The authors acknowledge the entanglement of norms of recognition in contested relations of power that influence the formation of subjects and the normative ambivalence of recognition which enables and constrains subjective agency. Ongoing inequality and social injustice makes palpable the practical effects of norms of mis/recognition. The authors reinterpret the concept of recognition to allow for normative ambivalence and ideological sensitivity in the current postcolonial
setting.
Description
Research paper
Keywords
Ambivalence, Critical theory, Ideology, Postcolonial conflict
Citation
Allsobrook, C. (2024) ‘Strategies of normative ambivalence in critical theories of recognition for the decolonised diagnosis of conflict and oppression’, Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 71(181), pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2024.7118101.